In this respect, with the possibility of misinterpretations, von Bertalanffy  believed a general theory of systems "should be an important regulative device in science", to guard against superficial analogies that "are useless in science and harmful in their practical consequences".
A lot of them well there will be a lot of them once I get more of them written revolve around issues of health and healthcare, since that's my primary focus, but will attempt to place it in the context of a philosophy and model of existence that breaks out of the materialism in all senses of the biomedical model, encompassing recent developments in many different areas of enquiry as well as older, traditional world views, cosmologies and philosophies.
Time for a Change of Heart? It doesn't need to go beyond that to make its point — which is that the underlying proximal cause of cardiovascular disease is staring us in the face. There are, of course, dimensions to the issue beyond mainstream science which I hope to cover in another essay at some point.
Article of the Moment by Robin Kimmerer Going beyond my own work, fresh perspectives which offer a glimpse into the changes taking place in our understanding of the world — or just plain fascinating stories — are featured in the Article of the Moment which will be updated every time I find something interesting to feature.
The current article was linked on December 09 See the Archive left for all previous articles. In Search of the Whole Elephant There are two principal assumptions in the work that follows and all my work, come to that.
The first is that any description of reality that has ever been produced is just that. A description, a map, or a model of it. It is not reality itself even though we tend to live our lives for most of the time as if that's the case. Though it might appear to be splitting hairs, this is an important distinction.
All too often the map gets mistaken for the territory, or worse, is given precedence over it.
The second is that any half-way decent attempt to construct a robust model of the nature of existence needs to accommodate the full range of human experience and knowledge in every field through all times, rather than flitting from one limited subset of it to another and relying on dismissing the remainder as somehow irrelevant or inadmissible in order to continue to support its conclusions.
It's the old story of the blind men and the elephant. Every view contains truth within its limited context, but each, in believing it encompasses the entirety, is mistaken. So nobody's completely right and nobody's completely wrong.
Everyone has a bit of truth and everyone has some things back to front and inside out especially inside out about it as well. This is a premise most people can accept. It's a level playing field on which that oppositional pantomime "oh yes it is!
A completely impartial view of the evidence would seem to suggest that reality itself doesn't appear to favour any one view over any other. It cheerfully supports diametrically opposing viewpoints on all sorts of things to do with it, and obligingly offers up proof after proof to their proponents that enables them all to lay claim to validity and consequently take the pantomime into yet another sell-out season.
In other words, our thought systems generate their own proof. See Holed in One for more on this concept. Phillippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim Paracelsus Vitalism Revitalised March Vitalism — the idea that understanding the workings of nature needs to take into account the role of a "life force" — has been fairly ridiculed in modern times, and despite developments of a more metaphysical nature such as Rupert Sheldrake 's work on "morphic fields" and the Global Consciouness Projectthere still appears to be a widespread reluctance to link any such "fields" to the intelligence and meaning we experience as a prominent part of daily existence.
The prevailing consensus seems to prefer a mechanistic model of existence which proposes that we operate in ways which can be entirely explained in terms of biochemical reactions and physical processes.
Vitalistic perspectives tend to be accorded about as much respect as animistic beliefs, being widely regarded either as laughably quaint and "primitive", or as "new agey" whatever that may mean. With the application of the mechanistic model now beginning to beg more questions than it can answer, perhaps it's time to revisit vitalism.
After all, how would you feel about an electrician who claimed that electricity had no real relevance in explaining the workings of an electrical circuit? This is the very cornerstone of our trust in it. Its symbol, the white lab coat, has come to stand for the detached viewpoint, untainted by all the irrational prejudices and erroneous reasonings of daily life.
It has no colours to nail to the mast; it's pure, sterile, incorruptible, emotionless. It has gravitas, befitting the serious questions being addressed by its wearer, who should preferably also be wearing an unsmiling, intensely heroic expression and spectacles.
A passing resemblance to Clark Kent may help. It's deferred to as the mantle of the Higher Authority, much as a priest's robes used to be and occasionally still are.
And while there's not quite the aroma of incense about it — perhaps instead a Bacon sandwich half consumed and forgotten in the midst of something far more important?Risk Systems That Read augments Northfield’s already comprehensive models to deliver a more accurate and detailed understanding of risk.
It offers the statistical stability of a long-term model forecast enhanced by rapid adaptation to changing market conditions, over a very broad range of asset coverage. Information Technology Essay; Information Technology Essay.
Words 14 Pages. Unification of the actual and future information systems used by Incodepf and the new global innovations in technology Karen Lorena Ospina Hidalgo Managerial Applications of Information Technology DeVry University, Keller Graduate School of Management .
English for Specific Purposes World, ISSN , attheheels.com, Issue 40, vol. 14, Error Analysis of Written English Essays: The case of Students. The largest collection of literature study guides, lesson plans & educational resources for students & teachers.
Aeon is a registered charity committed to the spread of knowledge and a cosmopolitan worldview. Our mission is to create a sanctuary online for serious thinking.
Karl Friston. is the Wellcome principal research fellow and scientific director at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging and professor of neurology at University College London.